<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1118 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183491</link>
    <description>While assessing compensation for acquired agricultural land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, only the land&#039;s market value on the Section 4 notification date and legally relevant agricultural factors could be considered; the value of silk cocoons or silk thread from later sericulture or manufacturing activity was impermissible as a basis for capitalising compensation. The Court also held that interest under the Act did not run for the period before the Section 4 notification, though the landowners could pursue damages for pre-notification dispossession. Applying comparable sales and the nature of the land, the market value was fixed at revised rates for wet/garden and dry land, with statutory benefits on the enhanced compensation maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1118 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183491</link>
      <description>While assessing compensation for acquired agricultural land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, only the land&#039;s market value on the Section 4 notification date and legally relevant agricultural factors could be considered; the value of silk cocoons or silk thread from later sericulture or manufacturing activity was impermissible as a basis for capitalising compensation. The Court also held that interest under the Act did not run for the period before the Section 4 notification, though the landowners could pursue damages for pre-notification dispossession. Applying comparable sales and the nature of the land, the market value was fixed at revised rates for wet/garden and dry land, with statutory benefits on the enhanced compensation maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>