<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328703</link>
    <description>The case involved issues concerning the taxability of a significant amount mentioned in a show cause notice and the applicability of service tax on works contracts. The tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for re-examination without requiring a pre-deposit, following a previous Apex Court judgment. Specific guidelines were provided for the adjudicating authority to follow, focusing on the taxability of services in works contracts executed before a specified date. The authority was instructed to review the case independently, grant a fair hearing, and conclude the matter by a set deadline. The stay application was disposed of, and the appeal was remanded for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328703</link>
      <description>The case involved issues concerning the taxability of a significant amount mentioned in a show cause notice and the applicability of service tax on works contracts. The tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for re-examination without requiring a pre-deposit, following a previous Apex Court judgment. Specific guidelines were provided for the adjudicating authority to follow, focusing on the taxability of services in works contracts executed before a specified date. The authority was instructed to review the case independently, grant a fair hearing, and conclude the matter by a set deadline. The stay application was disposed of, and the appeal was remanded for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>