<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328700</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the appellant promptly paid the service tax along with interest after being alerted, citing personal reasons for the delay in payment due to financial hardship caused by a family member&#039;s illness. The tribunal found no evidence of suppression or misstatement in accounts and concluded that the penalty should be waived in such circumstances, in line with precedent judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328700</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the appellant promptly paid the service tax along with interest after being alerted, citing personal reasons for the delay in payment due to financial hardship caused by a family member&#039;s illness. The tribunal found no evidence of suppression or misstatement in accounts and concluded that the penalty should be waived in such circumstances, in line with precedent judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>