<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328699</link>
    <description>The court condoned a delay of 405 days in filing appeals before CESTAT, despite initially dismissing the condonation petitions. The appellant&#039;s reasons for delay, including misplacement of orders and personal bereavement, were deemed unsatisfactory. However, considering the potential prejudice caused by dismissal, the court balanced the principles of justice and condoned the delay on the condition that costs are paid to the Chief Justice&#039;s Relief Fund. This decision allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals to proceed, closing the related Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328699</link>
      <description>The court condoned a delay of 405 days in filing appeals before CESTAT, despite initially dismissing the condonation petitions. The appellant&#039;s reasons for delay, including misplacement of orders and personal bereavement, were deemed unsatisfactory. However, considering the potential prejudice caused by dismissal, the court balanced the principles of justice and condoned the delay on the condition that costs are paid to the Chief Justice&#039;s Relief Fund. This decision allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals to proceed, closing the related Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>