<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 403 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders confirming a Central Excise duty demand on multiple manufacturing units due to the lack of clarity in identifying the principal manufacturer and dummy units for clubbing clearances. The duty demand was found to be inconsistent with statutory provisions, and the adjudication order did not specify the principal manufacturer, leading to confusion regarding duty liability. Citing legal precedents, including a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant based on established principles that clubbing of clearances requires clear identification of principal and dummy units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 403 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders confirming a Central Excise duty demand on multiple manufacturing units due to the lack of clarity in identifying the principal manufacturer and dummy units for clubbing clearances. The duty demand was found to be inconsistent with statutory provisions, and the adjudication order did not specify the principal manufacturer, leading to confusion regarding duty liability. Citing legal precedents, including a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant based on established principles that clubbing of clearances requires clear identification of principal and dummy units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>