<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3769</link>
    <description>Taxability under service tax depends on the real nature of the contractual arrangement and the services actually rendered, not on the label of a consignment stockistship or agency agreement. The record indicated functions such as receiving orders, stocking goods, maintaining accounts and collecting tax, but the factual foundation for deciding whether these activities amounted to clearing and forwarding operations was incomplete. Because the principal activity and exact nature of services during the relevant period were not fully determined, service tax liability could not be finally resolved on the material available, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3769</link>
      <description>Taxability under service tax depends on the real nature of the contractual arrangement and the services actually rendered, not on the label of a consignment stockistship or agency agreement. The record indicated functions such as receiving orders, stocking goods, maintaining accounts and collecting tax, but the factual foundation for deciding whether these activities amounted to clearing and forwarding operations was incomplete. Because the principal activity and exact nature of services during the relevant period were not fully determined, service tax liability could not be finally resolved on the material available, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>