<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 372 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328663</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal by deleting additions for AMC charges and printing expenses due to compliance with relevant provisions. However, the disallowance of electricity expenses was upheld as not solely for business purposes. The ITAT reversed the disallowance of remuneration to partners, citing a genuine amended partnership deed and compliance with Sec. 40(b)(v).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 372 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328663</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal by deleting additions for AMC charges and printing expenses due to compliance with relevant provisions. However, the disallowance of electricity expenses was upheld as not solely for business purposes. The ITAT reversed the disallowance of remuneration to partners, citing a genuine amended partnership deed and compliance with Sec. 40(b)(v).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>