<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 251 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183481</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Court found that the settlement proposal between the assessee and the Revenue was not fully accepted, especially regarding the waiver of interest and penalty. The disclosure of income was deemed non-voluntary, failing to meet the conditions for waiver under Section 273A. The Court also concluded that the discretion under Article 226 could not be invoked, and the request for continuation of interim relief was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 251 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183481</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Court found that the settlement proposal between the assessee and the Revenue was not fully accepted, especially regarding the waiver of interest and penalty. The disclosure of income was deemed non-voluntary, failing to meet the conditions for waiver under Section 273A. The Court also concluded that the discretion under Article 226 could not be invoked, and the request for continuation of interim relief was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>