https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183465 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the services provided fell under Scientific and Technical Consultancy Services rather than Consulting Engineer services for Service Tax purposes. The Collaboration Agreement for technology transfer did not constitute Consulting Engineer services, as argued by the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the correct categorization of services and cited relevant case laws to support the decision, ultimately granting relief to the appellant from the Service Tax demand. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:38:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183465 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the services provided fell under Scientific and Technical Consultancy Services rather than Consulting Engineer services for Service Tax purposes. The Collaboration Agreement for technology transfer did not constitute Consulting Engineer services, as argued by the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the correct categorization of services and cited relevant case laws to support the decision, ultimately granting relief to the appellant from the Service Tax demand. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183465