<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 970 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183463</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order directing payment of &amp;amp;8377; 5 crores, finding no grounds for interference. The Court acknowledged the oversight in not considering the Bank Guarantee provided by the Petitioner and modified the order to allow its encashment. Additionally, the Court directed the Petitioner to seek the release of the Bank Guarantee for helicopter VT-AZX from the Commissioner. The writ petition was disposed of with these modifications and directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 970 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183463</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order directing payment of &amp;amp;8377; 5 crores, finding no grounds for interference. The Court acknowledged the oversight in not considering the Bank Guarantee provided by the Petitioner and modified the order to allow its encashment. Additionally, the Court directed the Petitioner to seek the release of the Bank Guarantee for helicopter VT-AZX from the Commissioner. The writ petition was disposed of with these modifications and directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>