<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 353 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellants eligible for a refund of Additional Duties of Excise [Textiles and Textile Articles] under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. However, the refund was restricted to the re-entered credit in November 2010, and the matter was referred back to the Original Authority for quantification. The appellants were directed to provide supporting documentation for the claim. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 353 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellants eligible for a refund of Additional Duties of Excise [Textiles and Textile Articles] under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. However, the refund was restricted to the re-entered credit in November 2010, and the matter was referred back to the Original Authority for quantification. The appellants were directed to provide supporting documentation for the claim. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>