<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 351 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328642</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the confiscation of goods under the Bill of Entry, emphasizing the need to exhaust appeal remedies provided under the Customs Act before approaching the High Court. The court highlighted the importance of following the statutory appeal process and natural justice principles, ultimately ruling against the petitioner&#039;s request for unconditional and provisional release of the confiscated goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 351 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328642</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the confiscation of goods under the Bill of Entry, emphasizing the need to exhaust appeal remedies provided under the Customs Act before approaching the High Court. The court highlighted the importance of following the statutory appeal process and natural justice principles, ultimately ruling against the petitioner&#039;s request for unconditional and provisional release of the confiscated goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>