<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 344 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328635</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and directed the revisions to be reconsidered due to the crucial issue of limitation not being adequately addressed. The respondent was instructed to re-examine the matter in light of the Court&#039;s observations and issue a new order within three months. Both parties&#039; rights and contentions were to remain open during the revisional proceedings, with the appeals allowed partially and no costs awarded. The judgment emphasized the significance of addressing the limitation issue and ensuring a lawful decision within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 344 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328635</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and directed the revisions to be reconsidered due to the crucial issue of limitation not being adequately addressed. The respondent was instructed to re-examine the matter in light of the Court&#039;s observations and issue a new order within three months. Both parties&#039; rights and contentions were to remain open during the revisional proceedings, with the appeals allowed partially and no costs awarded. The judgment emphasized the significance of addressing the limitation issue and ensuring a lawful decision within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>