https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328630 Writ relief was declined against a SARFAESI e-auction because the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 17 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and had not pursued it. The Court held that Article 226 intervention may be refused where it would be unjust or improper, especially where further delay would obstruct a sale involving public dues, and it therefore left the auction undisturbed while keeping any lawful claim against the sale proceeds open. en-us Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:29:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328630 Writ relief was declined against a SARFAESI e-auction because the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 17 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and had not pursued it. The Court held that Article 226 intervention may be refused where it would be unjust or improper, especially where further delay would obstruct a sale involving public dues, and it therefore left the auction undisturbed while keeping any lawful claim against the sale proceeds open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328630