<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 334 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the rectification order dated 30.03.2009 was invalid due to being beyond the limitation period and lacking jurisdiction. The interest charged under Sections 234B and 234C was also deemed invalid. The orders of the AO and CIT(A) were quashed. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and limitation periods in tax assessments and rectifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 334 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the rectification order dated 30.03.2009 was invalid due to being beyond the limitation period and lacking jurisdiction. The interest charged under Sections 234B and 234C was also deemed invalid. The orders of the AO and CIT(A) were quashed. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and limitation periods in tax assessments and rectifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>