<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 332 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting primary issues for fresh adjudication in light of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and precedent. It ruled that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to short deduction of tax, allowing the appeal on Carriage Outward Expenses. The order was issued on May 31, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 332 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting primary issues for fresh adjudication in light of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and precedent. It ruled that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to short deduction of tax, allowing the appeal on Carriage Outward Expenses. The order was issued on May 31, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>