<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 327 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the assessment order valid despite the pending appeal, dismissing the appellant&#039;s contention. The addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) was reversed as the shareholding did not meet the threshold. The disallowance of interest under Section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for verification based on the retrospective application of the second proviso. The appeal was partly allowed, with the second ground accepted and the third ground remanded for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 327 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the assessment order valid despite the pending appeal, dismissing the appellant&#039;s contention. The addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) was reversed as the shareholding did not meet the threshold. The disallowance of interest under Section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for verification based on the retrospective application of the second proviso. The appeal was partly allowed, with the second ground accepted and the third ground remanded for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>