<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 908 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183452</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s (CLB) limited jurisdiction on forged documents and limitation issues. It emphasized the Civil Court&#039;s broader authority to address these matters and directed the Civil Court to independently evaluate the case without being constrained by the CLB&#039;s findings. The High Court allowed the Civil Court to make an independent decision on all aspects, including limitation, without being bound by the CLB&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 908 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183452</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s (CLB) limited jurisdiction on forged documents and limitation issues. It emphasized the Civil Court&#039;s broader authority to address these matters and directed the Civil Court to independently evaluate the case without being constrained by the CLB&#039;s findings. The High Court allowed the Civil Court to make an independent decision on all aspects, including limitation, without being bound by the CLB&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>