<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 36 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3756</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the liability to pay Service Tax on commission paid to foreign agents for export orders. The tribunal found that the appellants promptly paid the Service Tax upon notification and had a genuine doubt about the tax liability. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 36 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3756</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the liability to pay Service Tax on commission paid to foreign agents for export orders. The tribunal found that the appellants promptly paid the Service Tax upon notification and had a genuine doubt about the tax liability. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>