https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183442 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. The respondent's seniority as Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy.S.P.) was determined to be from June 29, 1987, the date of his formal absorption into the CBI. The Court emphasized that the respondent could not claim seniority from 1977 as he did not hold the Dy.S.P. or equivalent post in his parent department on a regular basis. The Office Memorandum dated May 29, 1986, regarding seniority of absorbed personnel was applied, and the respondent's claim for earlier seniority was dismissed. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183442 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. The respondent's seniority as Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy.S.P.) was determined to be from June 29, 1987, the date of his formal absorption into the CBI. The Court emphasized that the respondent could not claim seniority from 1977 as he did not hold the Dy.S.P. or equivalent post in his parent department on a regular basis. The Office Memorandum dated May 29, 1986, regarding seniority of absorbed personnel was applied, and the respondent's claim for earlier seniority was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183442