<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 974 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183435</link>
    <description>The court quashed Circular No. 38/2000-Cus. dated 10th May, 2000, ruling it was not in accordance with the law. It held that reprocessing in Kandla Free Trade Zone and Export Processing Zones should be considered as done in India, exempt from additional duty. Assessing Officers were not to be directed based on the Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 12:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 974 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183435</link>
      <description>The court quashed Circular No. 38/2000-Cus. dated 10th May, 2000, ruling it was not in accordance with the law. It held that reprocessing in Kandla Free Trade Zone and Export Processing Zones should be considered as done in India, exempt from additional duty. Assessing Officers were not to be directed based on the Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>