<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 323 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328614</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a communication under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES). The petitioner&#039;s delay in paying the second tranche of tax dues by six days led to the denial of the scheme&#039;s benefit. The court held that strict adherence to VCES provisions was necessary, as it represented a settlement between the assessee and the department. Despite the petitioner&#039;s compliance with the first payment, the minor delay breached the scheme&#039;s terms, preventing the petitioner from claiming benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=431008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 323 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328614</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a communication under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES). The petitioner&#039;s delay in paying the second tranche of tax dues by six days led to the denial of the scheme&#039;s benefit. The court held that strict adherence to VCES provisions was necessary, as it represented a settlement between the assessee and the department. Despite the petitioner&#039;s compliance with the first payment, the minor delay breached the scheme&#039;s terms, preventing the petitioner from claiming benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>