<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 186 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding duty on imported goods in a 100% EOU after the warehousing period expired. The Tribunal emphasized the liberal approach towards procedures for 100% EOUs, considering Circulars allowing extension of warehousing periods and destruction of obsolete goods. It noted the unique nature of goods in a 100% EOU and found no justification for demanding duty, especially when provisions existed for destruction of obsolete goods and relinquishment of title. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the order demanding duty, interest, and penalties, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 186 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding duty on imported goods in a 100% EOU after the warehousing period expired. The Tribunal emphasized the liberal approach towards procedures for 100% EOUs, considering Circulars allowing extension of warehousing periods and destruction of obsolete goods. It noted the unique nature of goods in a 100% EOU and found no justification for demanding duty, especially when provisions existed for destruction of obsolete goods and relinquishment of title. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the order demanding duty, interest, and penalties, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>