<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 304 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328595</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a company registered in Uttar Pradesh, in a case concerning the cancellation of a C-Form issued by the Department of Trade and Taxes (DT&amp;amp;T). The court held that there was no provision under the CST Act to cancel a C-Form once issued, and the retrospective cancellation of the purchasing dealer&#039;s CST registration did not affect the validity of the C-Form. The court directed the DT&amp;amp;T to rectify its decision and validate the C-Form, ultimately setting aside the cancellation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 304 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328595</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a company registered in Uttar Pradesh, in a case concerning the cancellation of a C-Form issued by the Department of Trade and Taxes (DT&amp;amp;T). The court held that there was no provision under the CST Act to cancel a C-Form once issued, and the retrospective cancellation of the purchasing dealer&#039;s CST registration did not affect the validity of the C-Form. The court directed the DT&amp;amp;T to rectify its decision and validate the C-Form, ultimately setting aside the cancellation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>