<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, granting relief to the assessee on all contested grounds. This included disallowance of certification expenses, cost of production of a feature film, advertisement and publicity expenses, cost of abandoned projects, and disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal held in favor of the assessee on each issue, allowing the expenses claimed and rejecting the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, granting relief to the assessee on all contested grounds. This included disallowance of certification expenses, cost of production of a feature film, advertisement and publicity expenses, cost of abandoned projects, and disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal held in favor of the assessee on each issue, allowing the expenses claimed and rejecting the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>