<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 185 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3748</link>
    <description>Full reversal of Cenvat credit attributable to exempted goods, together with interest, treats the manufacturer as having taken no credit on the relevant inputs. Consequently, the Rule 6 obligation to maintain separate accounts or pay a prescribed percentage of the exempted goods&#039; sale value does not survive. Although Rule 6 may generally apply where common inputs yield both dutiable and exempt excisable products, including unintended by-products, that principle did not sustain the demand once attributable credit was fully reversed. The demand for payment based on the exempted goods&#039; sale value was therefore neutralised, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 185 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3748</link>
      <description>Full reversal of Cenvat credit attributable to exempted goods, together with interest, treats the manufacturer as having taken no credit on the relevant inputs. Consequently, the Rule 6 obligation to maintain separate accounts or pay a prescribed percentage of the exempted goods&#039; sale value does not survive. Although Rule 6 may generally apply where common inputs yield both dutiable and exempt excisable products, including unintended by-products, that principle did not sustain the demand once attributable credit was fully reversed. The demand for payment based on the exempted goods&#039; sale value was therefore neutralised, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>