<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee-trust the benefit of accumulation under Section 11(2) for Rs. 1,89,10,525/-. The decision emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, recognizing the trust&#039;s hospital project as a valid basis for accumulation. The issue of the Rs. 2 Crores as a capital receipt remains unresolved, with the Tribunal focusing on broader exemption eligibility. The appeal was allowed, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee-trust the benefit of accumulation under Section 11(2) for Rs. 1,89,10,525/-. The decision emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, recognizing the trust&#039;s hospital project as a valid basis for accumulation. The issue of the Rs. 2 Crores as a capital receipt remains unresolved, with the Tribunal focusing on broader exemption eligibility. The appeal was allowed, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>