<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 292 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328583</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Assessee in a case concerning the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the reassessment was a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without fresh tangible material, setting aside the impugned orders. Additionally, the court determined that a trade discount given by the Appellant to obtain exclusive vendor status was a revenue expenditure, not a capital expenditure, rejecting the AO&#039;s contention and allowing the appeal in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 19:48:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 292 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328583</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Assessee in a case concerning the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the reassessment was a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without fresh tangible material, setting aside the impugned orders. Additionally, the court determined that a trade discount given by the Appellant to obtain exclusive vendor status was a revenue expenditure, not a capital expenditure, rejecting the AO&#039;s contention and allowing the appeal in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>