<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2007-08, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order confirming the addition of Rs. 14,31,647/- as unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide substantial evidence to support the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, leading to the rejection of all grounds of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 19:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2007-08, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order confirming the addition of Rs. 14,31,647/- as unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide substantial evidence to support the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, leading to the rejection of all grounds of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>