<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1326 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183406</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision that the appellant&#039;s appointments as Lecturer and Assistant Professor were irregular and vitiated by bias and fraud. The Court ordered a fresh advertisement to fill the vacancy created by setting aside the appellant&#039;s appointment, directing consideration of the appellant&#039;s actual experience for future applications. The judgment highlighted the need for judicial scrutiny of educational institutions&#039; actions to prevent arbitrariness and upheld the importance of following recruitment rules. No costs were awarded in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1326 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183406</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision that the appellant&#039;s appointments as Lecturer and Assistant Professor were irregular and vitiated by bias and fraud. The Court ordered a fresh advertisement to fill the vacancy created by setting aside the appellant&#039;s appointment, directing consideration of the appellant&#039;s actual experience for future applications. The judgment highlighted the need for judicial scrutiny of educational institutions&#039; actions to prevent arbitrariness and upheld the importance of following recruitment rules. No costs were awarded in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>