https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183402 A pure question of law on jurisdiction is not concluded by res judicata in a later proceeding between the same parties, even if an earlier decision had held that the court lacked jurisdiction under the rent control statute. Section 11 CPC binds matters directly and substantially in issue that were heard and finally decided by a competent court, but it does not give finality to an erroneous jurisdictional ruling so as to prevent reconsideration in a subsequent case on the same land. The earlier jurisdictional finding could not therefore bar the later application, and the appeals were allowed with the matters remitted for decision according to law. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:50:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183402 A pure question of law on jurisdiction is not concluded by res judicata in a later proceeding between the same parties, even if an earlier decision had held that the court lacked jurisdiction under the rent control statute. Section 11 CPC binds matters directly and substantially in issue that were heard and finally decided by a competent court, but it does not give finality to an erroneous jurisdictional ruling so as to prevent reconsideration in a subsequent case on the same land. The earlier jurisdictional finding could not therefore bar the later application, and the appeals were allowed with the matters remitted for decision according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183402