https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3743 The appellant was involved in alleged evasion of Central Excise duty by clearing goods without payment and invoice. The case also involved discrepancies in stock clearance and storage at different premises, lack of awareness of Central Excise rules by the appellant, imposition of a penalty for a technical lapse, and the acceptance of the Order-in-Original (OIO). The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside duty confirmation, confiscation of goods, interest demand, and the penalty, affirming the OIO and rejecting the Revenue's appeal. en-us Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3743 The appellant was involved in alleged evasion of Central Excise duty by clearing goods without payment and invoice. The case also involved discrepancies in stock clearance and storage at different premises, lack of awareness of Central Excise rules by the appellant, imposition of a penalty for a technical lapse, and the acceptance of the Order-in-Original (OIO). The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside duty confirmation, confiscation of goods, interest demand, and the penalty, affirming the OIO and rejecting the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3743