https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183397 The High Court held that the order cancelling and reducing permission for DTA sales lacked merit, violated natural justice principles, and was beyond the authority of Respondent no.2. Emphasizing the need for administrative powers to adhere to natural justice, the Court set aside the order, ruling in favor of the petitioners. It was determined that the power to review must be specifically granted by statute and cannot be self-conferred by an authority. As such, the petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2016 14:36:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183397 The High Court held that the order cancelling and reducing permission for DTA sales lacked merit, violated natural justice principles, and was beyond the authority of Respondent no.2. Emphasizing the need for administrative powers to adhere to natural justice, the Court set aside the order, ruling in favor of the petitioners. It was determined that the power to review must be specifically granted by statute and cannot be self-conferred by an authority. As such, the petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183397