<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183396</link>
    <description>An appeal filed with an inordinate delay of 645 days was not entertained because sufficient cause for condonation was not shown. The Supreme Court therefore dismissed the civil appeal on the ground of delay, without going into the substantive dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 14:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183396</link>
      <description>An appeal filed with an inordinate delay of 645 days was not entertained because sufficient cause for condonation was not shown. The Supreme Court therefore dismissed the civil appeal on the ground of delay, without going into the substantive dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>