https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183384 The appeal was allowed as the services provided by the appellants, involving the transfer of technology and technical know-how, were found not to qualify as "Consulting Engineer" services for Service Tax purposes. The Commissioner upheld jurisdiction over the foreign company based on the nature of services provided, despite their location abroad. The Order-in-Appeal setting aside the demands confirmed in the Order-in-Original was deemed valid by the Tribunal, supported by legal interpretations and precedents, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the Commissioner's ruling. en-us Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183384 The appeal was allowed as the services provided by the appellants, involving the transfer of technology and technical know-how, were found not to qualify as "Consulting Engineer" services for Service Tax purposes. The Commissioner upheld jurisdiction over the foreign company based on the nature of services provided, despite their location abroad. The Order-in-Appeal setting aside the demands confirmed in the Order-in-Original was deemed valid by the Tribunal, supported by legal interpretations and precedents, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the Commissioner's ruling. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183384