<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 704 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183379</link>
    <description>Successive bail applications are not barred, but a later application must rest on fresh facts, a change in law, or other material showing that the earlier view has become obsolete; repeating the same grounds without new material is insufficient and earlier reasoned findings should be given due weight. At the bail stage, the court assesses whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case and need not finally decide admissibility or evidentiary weight. On the record described, the earlier findings on the retracted confession, motive, and surrounding circumstances were treated as sufficient to support a prima facie case, and no fresh material justified a different view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 704 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183379</link>
      <description>Successive bail applications are not barred, but a later application must rest on fresh facts, a change in law, or other material showing that the earlier view has become obsolete; repeating the same grounds without new material is insufficient and earlier reasoned findings should be given due weight. At the bail stage, the court assesses whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case and need not finally decide admissibility or evidentiary weight. On the record described, the earlier findings on the retracted confession, motive, and surrounding circumstances were treated as sufficient to support a prima facie case, and no fresh material justified a different view.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>