<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 604 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183377</link>
    <description>Motor vehicle tax on vehicles used or kept for use within a State may be imposed and collected in advance where a refund mechanism applies on proved non-use. Section 3A of the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act and Rule 5 of the Rules are presented as valid machinery for such collection, rather than a levy on a non-existent taxable event. The higher tax rate for designated omnibuses is treated as constitutionally permissible because fiscal legislation may classify vehicle categories differently where the classification has a rational connection with the levy&#039;s object. The distinct treatment of designated omnibuses and contract carriages therefore does not constitute hostile discrimination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 604 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183377</link>
      <description>Motor vehicle tax on vehicles used or kept for use within a State may be imposed and collected in advance where a refund mechanism applies on proved non-use. Section 3A of the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act and Rule 5 of the Rules are presented as valid machinery for such collection, rather than a levy on a non-existent taxable event. The higher tax rate for designated omnibuses is treated as constitutionally permissible because fiscal legislation may classify vehicle categories differently where the classification has a rational connection with the levy&#039;s object. The distinct treatment of designated omnibuses and contract carriages therefore does not constitute hostile discrimination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>