<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328572</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on duty-paid paper used for taxable services could not be denied merely because the invoices passed through intermediary sellers rather than being issued directly on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. The documented trail, including the manufacturer&#039;s invoice, VAT invoices of the re-sellers, and cross-reference to the manufacturer&#039;s invoice number, sufficiently linked the goods cleared with the goods received by the assessee. The absence of a direct manufacturer invoice was only a technical defect and not a substantive basis to reject credit. Denial of Cenvat credit was therefore unjustified, and the credit was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328572</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on duty-paid paper used for taxable services could not be denied merely because the invoices passed through intermediary sellers rather than being issued directly on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. The documented trail, including the manufacturer&#039;s invoice, VAT invoices of the re-sellers, and cross-reference to the manufacturer&#039;s invoice number, sufficiently linked the goods cleared with the goods received by the assessee. The absence of a direct manufacturer invoice was only a technical defect and not a substantive basis to reject credit. Denial of Cenvat credit was therefore unjustified, and the credit was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>