<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1123 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183374</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 17/2009-ST is available only to the exporter who receives and uses the specified service for export, pays service tax on that service, and has not taken CENVAT credit. Where the goods are exported through a third-party merchant exporter and the claimant itself is not the exporter, the essential conditions of the notification are not met. The refund claim was therefore not admissible, and rejection of the claim was on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1123 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183374</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 17/2009-ST is available only to the exporter who receives and uses the specified service for export, pays service tax on that service, and has not taken CENVAT credit. Where the goods are exported through a third-party merchant exporter and the claimant itself is not the exporter, the essential conditions of the notification are not met. The refund claim was therefore not admissible, and rejection of the claim was on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>