<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 274 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit for materials like channels, angles, H.R. Plates, and welding electrodes used in manufacturing machinery parts but denied credit for materials like cement and CTD Bars used in civil construction. The decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s position, distinguishing between materials for machinery production and civil construction. The Tribunal upheld the demand for credit on specific items, emphasizing the need for accurate disclosure to prevent the extended period invocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 274 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit for materials like channels, angles, H.R. Plates, and welding electrodes used in manufacturing machinery parts but denied credit for materials like cement and CTD Bars used in civil construction. The decision aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s position, distinguishing between materials for machinery production and civil construction. The Tribunal upheld the demand for credit on specific items, emphasizing the need for accurate disclosure to prevent the extended period invocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>