https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328558 The Tribunal allowed the Appeal filed by the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed on them as the consignee of seized goods. The Tribunal found that the real owner of the goods was not identified, and without evidence proving the Appellant's ownership, the penalty under the Customs Act was not justified. The Order-in-Appeal upholding the penalty was overturned, providing relief to the Appellant. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jun 2016 12:49:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328558 The Tribunal allowed the Appeal filed by the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed on them as the consignee of seized goods. The Tribunal found that the real owner of the goods was not identified, and without evidence proving the Appellant's ownership, the penalty under the Customs Act was not justified. The Order-in-Appeal upholding the penalty was overturned, providing relief to the Appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328558