<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 264 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328555</link>
    <description>Documentation fees and running royalty paid under a technology collaboration agreement were not includible in the assessable value of imported goods because the payments related to technical documents, assistance and know-how for manufacture in India, not to the import transaction itself. The royalty was calculated on net ex-factory sales of finished products, and the imported components were separately valued at market price. As no link was shown between the imports and the impugned payments, and the payments were not a condition of sale of the imported goods, they could not be added under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The exclusion of those payments from customs valuation was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 264 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328555</link>
      <description>Documentation fees and running royalty paid under a technology collaboration agreement were not includible in the assessable value of imported goods because the payments related to technical documents, assistance and know-how for manufacture in India, not to the import transaction itself. The royalty was calculated on net ex-factory sales of finished products, and the imported components were separately valued at market price. As no link was shown between the imports and the impugned payments, and the payments were not a condition of sale of the imported goods, they could not be added under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The exclusion of those payments from customs valuation was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>