<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 249 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328540</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both the turnover filter and working capital adjustment, finding no infirmity in the orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of valid reasoning and consistency in applying filters and adjustments in transfer pricing cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:21:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 249 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328540</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both the turnover filter and working capital adjustment, finding no infirmity in the orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of valid reasoning and consistency in applying filters and adjustments in transfer pricing cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>