<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 247 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order, ruling that the mere need for verification does not justify reopening the assessment. It found that the reassessment was based on discrepancies in TDS benefits and did not indicate any income escapement. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the TDS claim restriction was unjustified as it was not based on a genuine belief of income escapement, allowing both appeals of the assessee and pronouncing the order in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 247 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order, ruling that the mere need for verification does not justify reopening the assessment. It found that the reassessment was based on discrepancies in TDS benefits and did not indicate any income escapement. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the TDS claim restriction was unjustified as it was not based on a genuine belief of income escapement, allowing both appeals of the assessee and pronouncing the order in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>