<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 899 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to retain the disallowance under Section 14A to the extent of Rs. 5,00,000. The decision emphasized the necessity of the Assessing Officer recording objective satisfaction before applying Rule 8D for disallowance computation under Section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 899 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to retain the disallowance under Section 14A to the extent of Rs. 5,00,000. The decision emphasized the necessity of the Assessing Officer recording objective satisfaction before applying Rule 8D for disallowance computation under Section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>