<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1045 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183364</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC allowed the petition, setting aside improper communications regarding a refund application under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The competent authority must dispose of the refund application within six weeks, with no observations made on the merits, leaving the decision to the competent authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1045 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183364</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC allowed the petition, setting aside improper communications regarding a refund application under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The competent authority must dispose of the refund application within six weeks, with no observations made on the merits, leaving the decision to the competent authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>