https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3730 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision to reject the petitioner's application under Section 32F(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the petitioner's failure to make a full and true disclosure of duty liability. The rejection was deemed justified, with the Court finding no procedural defects or violations of natural justice. The writ petition was dismissed at the admission stage. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3730 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision to reject the petitioner's application under Section 32F(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the petitioner's failure to make a full and true disclosure of duty liability. The rejection was deemed justified, with the Court finding no procedural defects or violations of natural justice. The writ petition was dismissed at the admission stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3730