<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 242 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328533</link>
    <description>An income tax attachment, by itself, does not bar registration of a sale certificate. The governing principle applied is that an attachment does not render a transfer void against all persons; it only makes a private transfer void as against claims enforceable under that attachment, and the judgment debtor&#039;s title is not extinguished until actual sale. On that basis, the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration merely because an attachment exists unless there is a specific statutory ground for refusal or an operative restraint order from a competent court. The document therefore confirms that attachment alone is not a valid basis to deny registration of a concluded sale certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 242 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328533</link>
      <description>An income tax attachment, by itself, does not bar registration of a sale certificate. The governing principle applied is that an attachment does not render a transfer void against all persons; it only makes a private transfer void as against claims enforceable under that attachment, and the judgment debtor&#039;s title is not extinguished until actual sale. On that basis, the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration merely because an attachment exists unless there is a specific statutory ground for refusal or an operative restraint order from a competent court. The document therefore confirms that attachment alone is not a valid basis to deny registration of a concluded sale certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>