https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183352 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order. It confirmed the District Council's authority to appoint and remove officers administratively, validating the Executive Committee's emergency suspension of the respondent. The Court clarified that the District Council had the power to appoint and remove officers without prior legislation. The respondent was entitled to full remuneration unless a statute or rule provided otherwise, as interim suspension without express authority did not permit withholding remuneration. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:10:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183352 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order. It confirmed the District Council's authority to appoint and remove officers administratively, validating the Executive Committee's emergency suspension of the respondent. The Court clarified that the District Council had the power to appoint and remove officers without prior legislation. The respondent was entitled to full remuneration unless a statute or rule provided otherwise, as interim suspension without express authority did not permit withholding remuneration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183352