https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328520 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the disputed services qualified as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules. Procedural lapses, such as the absence of registration numbers on invoices, were deemed insufficient to deny cenvat credit. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision and allowed all appeals of the appellant with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328520 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the disputed services qualified as input services under the Cenvat Credit Rules. Procedural lapses, such as the absence of registration numbers on invoices, were deemed insufficient to deny cenvat credit. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision and allowed all appeals of the appellant with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328520